Im Nordatlantik gibt es einen riesigen kalten Fleck, der Rätsel aufgibt. Alarmistisch gestimmte Forscher wie Stefan Rahmstorf sehen in ihm eine Abschwächung des Golfstroms und verkünden schlimme Konsequenzen für uns Erdlinge. Andere Forscher sehen eher die natürliche Klimavariabilität am Werke. Pablo Ortega fasste die Lage zum nordatlantischen Kaltspot jetzt in einem Blogartikel der Reading University zusammen. Er teilt Rahmstorfs Bedenken offenbar nicht und geht von einem baldigen Verschwinden des Kaltgebietes aus. Zitat aus dem Blogartikel:
The latest observations point to a likely reversal of the cold blob in the next few years. Positive NAO phases have been predominant since 2012, and Labrador Sea densities suggest that AMOC strength has been increasing since 2014. There is even evidence of a relative ESPNA warming starting last summer. Yet, it is too soon to determine whether these changes will be sustained long enough to reverse the cold blob completely. Indeed, to this date, the cold ESPNA anomaly has only slightly weakened with respect to the previous two years (Figure 3) – a small change that could be consistent with climate noise.
———————-
Kleiner Nachtrag zu unserem Beitrag „Eine unglaubliche Geschichte: Wikipedia und der Hamburger Forsythienstrauch„. Ein Leser wies uns auf einen Artikel auf wetter.de aus dem Jahr 2014 hin, der schon fast Fake News-Charakter hat. Lesen Sie selber:
Rekord: Früheste Forsythienblüte – der Frühling ist da!
[…] Früheste Forsythienblüte beweist es: Der Frühling ist eingetroffen. Wenn man einen unparteiischen Frühlingsboten braucht, ist der Forsythienstrauch die beste Wahl. Und der hat sein Urteil schon gesprochen: Der Frühling ist in Deutschland schon so gut wie eingetroffen. Um es ganz genau zu sagen, der Vorfrühling. Und damit ist die Natur in diesem Jahr äußerst früh dran. Wenn man die Vergangenheit ansieht, ist im Schnitt der 30. März der Stichtag für die ersten Fosythienblüten. Das ist genau eineinhalb Monate später als in diesem Jahr. Weiterlesen auf wetter.de
Die angebliche Sensation verpufft sogleich, wenn man sich den Blühbeginn der letzten 30 Jahre im Kontext anschaut (Abb. 1 hier).
———————-
Schon spannender dieses Ergebnis des National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR): Schnee schmilzt langsamer bei wärmerem Klima! Glauben Sie nicht? Lesen Sie selbst, steht in der Pressemitteilung des NCAR vom 27. Februar 2017:
Slower snowmelt in a warming world
As the world warms, mountain snowpack will not only melt earlier, it will also melt more slowly, according to a new study by scientists at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR). The counterintuitive finding, published today in the journal Nature Climate Change, could have widespread implications for water supplies, ecosystem health, and flood risk.
„When snowmelt shifts earlier in the year, the snow is no longer melting under the high sun angles of late spring and early summer,“ said NCAR postdoctoral researcher Keith Musselman, lead author of the paper. „The Sun just isn’t providing enough energy at that time of year to drive high snowmelt rates.“ The study was funded by the National Science Foundation, NCAR’s sponsor.
The findings could explain recent research that suggests the average streamflow in watersheds encompassing snowy mountains may decline as the climate warms — even if the total amount of precipitation in the watershed remains unchanged. That’s because the snowmelt rate can directly affect streamflow. When snowpack melts more slowly, the resulting water lingers in the soil, giving plants more opportunity to take up the moisture. Water absorbed by plants is water that doesn’t make it into the stream, potentially reducing flows. Musselman first became interested in how snowmelt rates might change in the future when he was doing research in the Sierra Nevada. He noticed that shallower, lower-elevation snowpack melted earlier and more slowly than thicker, higher-elevation snowpack. The snow at cooler, higher elevations tended to stick around until early summer — when the Sun was relatively high in the sky and the days had grown longer — so when it finally started to melt, the melt was rapid.
Musselman wondered if the same phenomenon would unfold in a future climate, when warmer temperatures are expected to transform higher-elevation snowpack into something that looks much more like today’s lower-elevation snowpack. If so, the result would be more snow melting slowly and less snow melting quickly. To investigate the question, Musselman first confirmed what he’d noticed in the Sierra by analyzing a decade’s worth of snowpack observations from 979 stations in the United States and Canada. He and his co-authors — NCAR scientists Martyn Clark, Changhai Liu, Kyoko Ikeda, and Roy Rasmussen — then simulated snowpack over the same decade using the NCAR-based Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model.
Once they determined that the output from WRF tracked with the observations, they used simulations from the model to investigate how snowmelt rates might change in North America around the end of the century if climate change continues unabated. „We found a decrease in the total volume of meltwater — which makes sense given that we expect there to be less snow overall in the future,“ Musselman said. „But even with this decrease, we found an increase in the amount of water produced at low melt rates and, on the flip side, a decrease in the amount of water produced at high melt rates.“
While the study did not investigate the range of implications that could come from the findings, Musselman said the impacts could be far-reaching. For example, a reduction in high melt rates could mean fewer spring floods, which could lower the risk of infrastructure damage but also negatively affect riparian ecosystems. Changes in the timing and amount of snowmelt runoff could also cause warmer stream temperatures, which would affect trout and other fish species, and the expected decrease in streamflow could cause shortages in urban water supplies. „We hope this study motivates scientists from many other disciplines to dig into our research so we can better understand the vast implications of this projected shift in hydrologic patterns,“ Musselman said.
About the article: Slower snowmelt in a warmer world, Authors: Keith N. Musselman, Martyn P. Clark, Changhai Liu, Kyoko Ikeda, and Roy Rasmussen. Journal: Nature Climate Change, DOI: 10.1038/nclimate3225
